logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2010. 03. 25. 선고 2009두22515 판결
거래처가 자료상으로 판명되었지만 금지금을 실제 매입했다는 주장의 당부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2009Nu8344 ( November 13, 2009)

Title

The legitimacy of the assertion that the customer has actually purchased gold bullion although the customer was proved to be material;

Summary

The fact that the customer prepared a false tax invoice that is not a real transaction is finalized in the criminal judgment, and there is no evidence to prove that it has been paid as the purchase price, and it is judged as a non-real transaction.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized as groundless. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided

arrow