공직선거법위반
2017Do15613 Violation of the Public Official Election Act
A person shall be appointed.
Defendant
Law Firm (LLC) CE, Attorneys CL, CF, CG, CH
Gwangju High Court ( Jeonju) Decision 2017No89 Decided September 15, 2017
December 22, 2017
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found all of the facts charged in the instant case guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the statute of limitations and public prosecution, the admissibility of illegally collected evidence and derivative evidence
Meanwhile, Article 58(1) of the Public Official Election Act does not violate the principle of clarity of the principle of no punishment without law (see Supreme Court Order 2007Hu232, Oct. 11, 2007) and Article 60(1)4 of the Public Official Election Act does not violate the principle of no punishment without law (see Supreme Court Decision 200456168, Jul. 28, 2006, etc.). Accordingly, the grounds of appeal related thereto cannot be accepted.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Kim Jae-hyung
Justices Park Young-young
Justices Kim Chang-suk
Justices Lee Dong-won