임야가 관리・처분이 부적당한 재산에 해당하다고 인정하기 어려움[국패]
Seoul High Court 2013Nu13008 ( October 25, 2013)
2012west 1696
It is difficult to recognize that forest land constitutes an inappropriate property for the management and disposition thereof.
In light of the same individual land price, it is difficult to recognize that the video alone constitutes an inappropriate property for the management and disposition of the forest.
Article 73(1) of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act
Supreme Court
Part III
2013Du24136 No disposition of revocation of payment in kind
AA
ㅇㅇ ㅇㅇㅇ ㅇㅇ로00
소송대리인 법무법인 ㅇㅇ(담당변호사 ㅇㅇㅇ, ㅇㅇㅇ)
ㅇㅇ세무서장
소송수행자 ㅇㅇㅇ
The Seoul High Court Decision 2013Nu13008 decided October 25, 2013
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per
February 28, 2014
재판장대법관ㅇㅇㅇ
주심대법관ㅇㅇㅇ
대법관ㅇㅇㅇ
대법관ㅇㅇㅇ