1. According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below accepted the preliminary claim on August 26, 1980 as to the real estate recorded in the attachment list (Attachment of the judgment of the court below) by Plaintiff 3, such as Plaintiff’s Nonparty Nonparty Nonparty’s Nonparty’s Nonparty’s Nonparty’s Nonparty’s Nonparty’s Nonparty’s litigant’s litigant’s litigant’s litigant’s litigant’s litigant’s litigant’s litigant’s Claimant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Claimant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Claimant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Claimant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Claimant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Appellant’s Claimant’s Claimant’s LLC’s her her her her son’s son’s ent.

2. In order to secure multiple creditors' claims against a single debtor, where multiple creditors jointly have made a pre-sale agreement with multiple creditors as to real estate owned by the debtor and a provisional registration for the preservation of the right to claim the transfer registration of ownership has been made, multiple creditors are in a relationship with the completion of the right to claim the transfer registration of ownership as at the time of original adjudication, and as at the time of filing of a lawsuit seeking the exercise of the right to complete the purchase and sale agreement and the transfer registration of ownership based thereon, it is a disposal act of the right to complete the purchase and sale. Therefore, since a lawsuit seeking the completion of the pre-sale agreement is a disposal act of the right to complete the purchase and sale, only a part of multiple creditors, who are not multiple creditors, can not be said to be a disposal act of the right to complete the purchase and sale, and the declaration of intention to complete the sale should be jointly exercised by a multiple creditors who have completed the right to complete the purchase and sale agreement as necessary co-litigation, and thus, it should be concluded that a lawsuit seeking the transfer registration of ownership to the object of the provisional registration is an act of disposal and management.

On the other hand, the court below's decision that the provisional registration is entitled to seek the principal registration of transfer of ownership based on the provisional registration from all the holders of the right to provisional registration including plaintiff 2 by agreement to automatically complete the sale and purchase reservation, and thereby, by preserving or managing the right to preserve the ownership transfer based on the provisional registration, is first aware that the change of the title is clearly sought by the act of preservation or management, and furthermore, the court below accepted the claim without title in relation to the plaintiff 2, who is the joint registration administrator, by citing the legal principles on the preservation or management act and the necessary co-litigation, etc., which are related to the plaintiff 2, the plaintiff 30,00 except for the plaintiff 2, and the plaintiff 30,00.

3. Therefore, since the judgment of the court below cannot be maintained without the necessity of judgment on the remaining grounds of appeal Nos. 2 and 3, the part of the judgment below against the defendant shall be reversed, and this part of the case shall be remanded to the Seoul High Court for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

Justices Park Jong-soo (Presiding Justice)