개점연기권고처분취소청구
2019du59820 Demanding the revocation of a recommendation for extension
A Stock Company
Attorney Hong-man, Justice Lee Jae-soo, Justice Lee Jae-young, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant
The Minister of SMEs and Startups
Law Firm Sejong (LLC)
Attorney Kim private-public, Kim Yong-dam, Park Jong-gu, Park Jong-dae, Park Jong-dae, Park Jong-il
B Partnership
Seoul High Court Decision 2019Nu39576 Decided October 25, 2019
March 12, 2020
The appeal is dismissed.
Of the costs of appeal, the supplementary intervenor is assessed against the supplementary intervenor, and the remainder is assessed against the defendant.
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition
March 12, 2020
The presiding judge shall keep the record of the Justice
Justices Lee Dong-won
Justices Park Jong-young