농지를 실제 8년이상 자경하였다는 주장의 당부[국승]
Seoul High Court 2009Nu22661 (Law No. 14, 2010)
Incheon District Court 2009Gudan352 (25 June 25, 2009)
Appropriateness of the assertion that farmland was self-refised for 8 years or more;
It is difficult to believe the plaintiff's assertion in light of the fact that the plaintiff served as the representative director of the construction company during the period of self-reliance, the real estate rental business.
The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal of Supreme Court. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per