(심리불속행) 행정소송법 제8조 제2항 규정에 따른 판단누락으로 인한 재심대상판결 해당여부[국승]
Seoul High Court-2019-Reu-10017 (Law No. 17, 2019)
(Incompetence of Trial) Whether an administrative decision is subject to a retrial due to omission of judgment pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act.
(2) The court below's rejection of a petition for retrial on the ground that the court below's omission of judgment as a ground for retrial is not a ground for retrial.
Article 39 (Secondary Liability to Pay Taxes by Investor)
2019du50328 Demanding confirmation of invalidity of the designation of the person liable for secondary tax payment
○ ○
○ Head of tax office
Seoul High Court Decision 2019Nu10017 Decided July 17, 2019
November 15, 2019
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Plaintiffs).
Examining the grounds of appeal by the lower court, it is evident that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.