가.유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반나.방문판매등에관한법률위반
2019Do1462 A. Violation of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission
(b) Violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act;
1. C.
2. D;
3. E.
4. F;
5. G.
6. H;
7. I
Defendants
Attorney Kim Young-gu (Defendant C, E, F, G, I)
Attorney Park Ho-sung (the national election for defendant D)
Attorney Kim Jong-jin (Defendant H)
Seoul Central District Court Decision 2018No2816 Decided January 9, 2019
May 30, 2019
All appeals are dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the Defendants of the charges (excluding the portion of acquittal in the reasoning). Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal doctrine and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Activities and the establishment of a crime of violating the Door-to-Door Sales Act. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent
Justices Park Sang-ok
Justices Noh Jeong-chul
Chief Justice Noh Jeong-hee
Justices Kim In-bok