beta
(영문) 광주고등법원 2012.11.22. 선고 2012누736 판결

체당금지급대상부적격처분취소

Cases

2012Nu736 Revocation of Disposition of Disqualified for a substitute payment

Plaintiff-Appellant

1. A;

2. B

3. C.

4. D;

5. E.

Defendant Appellant

The head of the Gwangju Regional Employment and Labor Office

The first instance judgment

Gwangju District Court Decision 2012Guhap10 Decided June 21, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

October 25, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

November 22, 2012

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

On November 8, 2011, the Defendant’s non-conformity disposition against Plaintiff A and B and the non-conformity disposition against Plaintiff C, D, and E, respectively, shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and all plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it can be accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge, senior judge and assistant judge

Judges Cho Jae-ho

Judges Namnam Sea