beta
(영문) 대법원 1985. 10. 17.자 85그89 결정

[판결경정신청각하결정][공1986.2.1.(769),229]

Main Issues

If errors have occurred in the judgment due to the fault of the parties at the request of the parties;

Summary of Judgment

In accordance with Article 197(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, an error of the judgment that the court may correct is not only caused by the fault of the court, but also caused by the party’s fault.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 197(1) of the Civil Procedure Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Order 83G7 Dated April 19, 1983 84G60 Dated October 31, 1984

Special Appellants

Special Appellant 1 and 11 others

United States of America

Seoul District Court Order 85Ka6178 dated May 24, 1985

Text

I reverse the original decision.

In the Seoul High Court Decision 81Na3083 decided July 12, 1983, the real estate indicated in the attached Table 4 shall be corrected to 286 square meters of forest land in Gangdong-gu Seoul ( Address omitted).

Reasons

The grounds for special appeal are examined.

In accordance with Article 197(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the error of the judgment that the court may correct is included not only in the case where it was caused by the fault of the court, but also in the case where the party's fault was caused. According to the records, it is evident that the real estate indicated in the attachment No. 4 in the Seoul Gangdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City ( Address omitted) forest 4,288m2 is recorded as a forest 4,288m2 in the attachment No. 8 of the Seoul High Court Decision 81Na3083, Jul. 12, 1983, on which the special appellant sought correction, it constitutes an error of the judgment that can be determined pursuant to Article 197(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, because it is obvious that the special appellant's error is one of the errors in the written complaint

The court below's dismissal of the special appellant's application for correction without merit is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles that affected the judgment, and therefore, the special appellant's argument is reasonable.

Therefore, the original decision is reversed, and this case is deemed sufficient to be judged by the party members. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Jong-soo (Presiding Justice)