1. The Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the appointed parties C, respectively, KRW 6,406,560; and (b) the appointed parties D, KRW 9,609,840, and the appointed parties.

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased H (hereinafter “the deceased”) was employed by the Defendant from August 1, 2014 to July 31, 2017, and was employed by the Defendant as the Gwangju Northern-gu apartment security guard.

The Deceased was paid 16 hours a day during his service period and 900,000 won a month.

B. On August 16, 2017, the Deceased filed a petition with the Gwangju Regional Labor Office for the failure to pay the minimum wage and retirement allowance, etc. The representative of the Defendant I who works for the period from August 2014 to December 278 of 2016 and the minimum wage per hour based on the minimum wage per hour is KRW 5,210 on August 5, 2014 to December 12, 2014; KRW 5,580 on January 5, 2015 to December 5, 2015; KRW 030 on January 6, 2016 to December 12, 2017; and KRW 6,470 on January 7, 2017.

(2) At least KRW 900,00 per month below the amount of KRW 1,448,380 on August 2014 to December 12, 2015, KRW 1,551,240 on January 1, 2015 to December 12, 2016, KRW 1,676,340 on January 1, 2016, and KRW 1,798,660 on January 7, 2017, and KRW 26,163,480 on unpaid wages ( KRW 2,741,90 on August 2014, KRW 7,814,880 on 2015, KRW 9,316,080 on 2016, KRW 6,290 on 2017, KRW 6290 on 204,620 on retirement benefits) and did not pay the unpaid wages to the prosecutor's office within 160414 days on retirement.

I was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2,00,000 in the case of violation of the Labor Standards Act of Gwangju District Court 2018 High Court 736 and the Act on Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits.

C. On October 30, 2017, the Deceased died. On October 30, 2017, the Deceased has D’s spouse, the deceased’s child, and the deceased J (spouse E, children’s Appointor F, G), the Appointed C, and the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 5-3, 4, 7, Gap evidence 6-6 through 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant should have paid the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected person, who is the deceased's heir, to the deceased according to their shares of inheritance, and the unpaid wages and retirement allowances.