1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On January 9, 2018, the Plaintiff driven Bchip car at around 20:20, and concealed D buses in front of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, in the direction of the sub-section in the direction of the sub-section in the direction of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section of the sub-section.

C. On February 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) applied Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act to revoke the driver’s license (Class 1 and Class 1 common) on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take necessary measures after leaving the Plaintiff injured the instant accident; and (b) applied Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Grounds] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition in light of the following facts: (a) without dispute; (b) Gap evidence Nos. 1, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 15; and (c) the overall purport of the argument, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition, is a bus engineer, who lives as a driver; and (c) when the driver’s license is revoked, the Plaintiff’s livelihood is threatened with the parent-child who reaches

Judgment

With respect to the instant case, the following circumstances, i.e., (i) the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff was a person, did not take necessary relief measures, etc. because it is likely that the instant accident would occur while driving after drinking and that drinking would occur, and rather, it is highly likely to be criticized outside the place of the instant accident. (ii) Article 91(1) [Attachment 28] of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act

2. Subparagraph 1 of the revocation criteria provides that “When a person is killed or injured due to a traffic accident, and no rescue measures have been taken,” the revocation criteria shall be deemed to be the cause of the driver’s license.