The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On March 22, 2020, at around 09:55, the Plaintiff driven the B K5 car volume from the Myeonc-dong Seoul Metropolitan Government Myeonc-dong to go through the intersection by straightening it along one lane, while passing through the intersection, and she was faced with the part of the driver's seat front of the Poter in the traffic signal at one lane facing the central line at one lane (hereinafter "traffic accident in this case"). Accordingly, the Plaintiff sustained from the driver of the said Poter for approximately two weeks, and from the same passenger of the said Poter for about three weeks, each of the above Poter needs medical treatment.

(hereinafter referred to as “victims”. Nevertheless, the Plaintiff immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures such as aiding the victims.

On June 12, 2020, the Defendant issued a revocation disposition on the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (class I, II, II, and II motor vehicles) on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim, even though he injured the person due to the instant traffic accident.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). On June 25, 2020, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for administrative appeal on July 24, 2020.

On the other hand, on October 21, 2020, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced the Plaintiff to a conviction of a fine of KRW 5 million in relation to the crime that “The victims of the instant traffic accident have been injured and, at the same time, failed to take measures, such as immediately stopping the said scam and providing relief to the victims,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 29, 2020.

(hereinafter referred to as "relevant criminal case"). [The grounds for recognition] The plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case is legitimate. The plaintiff's assertion as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate is legitimate.