logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.08 2013노1304
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is consistent with the fact that the defendant has made a verbal dispute with the victim, but there is no fact that he/she has inflicted an injury on the victim, or caused an injury on the victim by breaking it.

2. In light of the difference between the first instance court and the appellate court’s method of evaluating the credibility of a witness’s statement in light of the contents of the first instance judgment and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, or the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a witness’s statement in light of the evidence examination conducted by the first instance court and the first instance court’s method of examining the credibility of a witness’s statement, the first instance court should not reverse the first instance court’s determination on the ground that the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a witness’s statement is different from the appellate court’s determination on the ground that the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a witness’s statement is not consistent with the first instance court’s determination (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2011Do5313, Jun. 14, 2012; 2011Do5313, Apr. 14, 201).

3...

arrow