logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.01.20 2019나89968
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except as “the part used after the second time,” and thus, (b) the same is cited by the main sentence of Article 4

2. Parts to be dried;

A. 3rd of the judgment of the first instance court, “The above-only rail 8” was cut off “The above-only rail 8 of the first instance judgment to “I am above the place where the above-only rail is connected to the tape so that people may not have access to the part without a rail between the above dedicated rail 8.”

B. On the 3rd side of the judgment of the first instance, a rail installed for the purpose of safety prevention.

“There are several rail railings for safety to prevent”.

There are parts without a railing to allow entry into and departure from the sea. At the time of the instant accident, in order to prevent ordinary people from approaching the sea, the part without a railing connected to each column of an exclusive rail was set off.

“ ..........”

(c)

Each "Sal-only rail" in the 19th 3th 19th 19, 5th 10th 5th 10 and 13th 13 of the judgment of the first instance shall be applied to "a place where a part without a rail connected with a tape is set off on each column of an exclusive rail."

(d)

The fourth 20th 20 of the judgment of the first instance court " particularly by installing a rail for safety" shall be cut off with " particularly by installing a rail for safety and by linking it with a tape."

E. On the 7th day of the first instance judgment, the 5th day of the 7th day of the first instance judgment “ particularly deemed to have installed a rail for safety purpose” used to read “ particularly to have installed a rail for safety purpose and connected it to the tape.”

3. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate. Thus, all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow