1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the instant case is as follows, and the Plaintiff’s assertion added to this court is identical to the part against the Defendant (except for the part against the Republic of Korea that became separate and finalized) for the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the judgment as set forth in the following paragraph 2, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is that “A” in the Republic of Korea “B,” the Defendants “B” and “B” in the Republic of Korea respectively.

On the third side of the judgment of the first instance, the first instance court was conducted on the following three pages: “B” between “B” and “M/H Ma Ma Ma Ma 6 (M/H Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma 66)” and “B” at least five manle.

On the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following three lines consist of the three electric lines "second lines" consisting of the existing transmission lines laid down in the section from the last 3 to the last 11 man man (hereinafter referred to as "the existing transmission lines of this case").

Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the "the instant tracks" in the 7th parallel, 8, 8, 9 parallel, and 11 under Table 5 attached to the judgment of the court of first instance shall be carried out with "the existing transmission line of this case" all of the existing transmission lines of this case.

The following "(including value added tax)" shall be added to "(including KRW 897,558,200)" of the conduct No. 13 under the fifth Schedule of the judgment of the first instance.

Each of the six parallels No. 7 and 10 parallels of the first instance judgment “897,58,200 Won” shall be construed as “815,962,00 Won”.

The following shall be added to the "reasonable" of the 6th judgment of the first instance. 21 conduct:

[The plaintiff planned the relocation of the instant tracks, both of the first, second, and last, proposed by the defendant company, and ② The remainder of the existing transmission lines of this case (the section between 3 and 5, and the section between 6 and 11, hereinafter referred to as the "section for the occupation and use of the road of this case") shall be removed from the existing transmission lines of this case without being left as they are, if only the other part of the existing transmission lines of this case (the part between 3 and 5, and the part between 6 and 11, hereinafter referred to as the "section for the occupation and use of the road of this case").