The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In determining the facts, the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, and the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Even if the facts charged in the instant case are found guilty, the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, one year of community service, 200 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. We examine the argument of misunderstanding of facts, i.e., the following circumstances that the witness of this case is recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below or that he could know in light of the facts recognized, i.e., ① the investigative agency and court of the court below where the witness of this case had been a customer, including the defendant, B, H, and two women, who continued to engage in severe bath to B, and refer to B. In the future B where the defendant was seated with the wall, and he was seated, and the head was flick, and the victim was flicked, and the victim was flick with his behavior, and it was difficult to see that the defendant and the defendant did not make an oral statement during the process of cafeteria, ② the defendant and the defendant's oral statement to the extent that he did not have been flicked, ② the defendant's oral statement to the extent that he had been flicked, ③ the defendant's oral statement to the outside of the court."