A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 26, 2016, the Defendant is suspected of having been living together with the victim D(37 years of age) who had been living together for about one year prior to the visit, from a small room inside the “C” operated by the Defendant, as well as around 11:00 on March 26, 2016, and was sitting before the visit, and only died before the visit.

Until 60 days, we do not know what kind of answer is.

“Intimidation” and monitoring the victim from leaving the victim to another place on the same day, the victim detained the victim for about four hours until he/she escaped, while leaving the toilet around 15:48 on the same day.

2. The Defendant, at around 16:50 on the same day as the foregoing, demanded the Defendant to voluntarily accompany the Defendant to the E zone with regard to the case of reporting the crime of confinement, by a person, other than F, etc., belonging to the E District Police Station, who was called up after receiving a report from the said D that he had been placed under confinement.

The Defendant himself stated that “Cock we are the couple of the husband and wife, and I am by a police box thereafter,” and that the security guard F was on board No. 1 of the E District patrol patrol, and explained the criminal facts and the reasons for voluntary accompanying, and the Defendant was “I am voluntarily accompanied and am on the patrol of the E District. I am the Defendant was forced to get on the patrol.”

“A police officer requested the Defendant to leave the patrol vehicle by refusing to accompany the police officer,” but the Defendant did not leave the patrol vehicle and forced the police officer to go on the patrol vehicle.

A. He shall have the care of any person.

The police officer interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports, such as keeping the F in order to operate the patrol vehicle, keeping the chief door of the patrol vehicle, preventing the operation thereof, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (e.g., interference with the performance of official duties);

1. Criminal facts;