A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 22, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on November 22, 2016, on the ground that he/she was boarding a taxi at the end point of the bus bus located in the exchange-dong, Northern-gu, North Korea, and moved the taxi to the exchange-park, and that he/she was not in the direction of his/her own needs, and that he/she was going to go to the F District of the F District located in the same Gu E on the same day with the taxi driver around 22:0 on the same day.

At the same place, Gman and patrolmen, who were the police officers belonging to the F District Police Team, requested the Defendant to get off the taxi at the taxi, requested the Defendant to get out of the taxi, and the Defendant assaulted the Defendant by putting down the hand of G’s hand on the cab belonging to the said District Police Team, and booming the click of G’s blick, and blicking the click of G’s blick, and flicking the blick, and flicked on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

2. On November 23, 2016, the Defendant was arrested of a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, such as Paragraph 1, and the following day on November 23, 11, 200:27, when the Defendant was the victim, G (27 taxes) brought about injury to the victim, on November 23, 201, in order to hand over the Defendant to a criminal charge of the police station in the north Port of the Port of the Republic of Korea, and the Defendant was prevented from escape from the victim who attempted to escape, and the Defendant was able to take a part of the victim’s entrance alcohol once in the part of the victim, and suffered injury, such as an internal inspection and injury.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and at the same time injured the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to J, I, H and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.