logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.10.22 2015고정1084
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a rocketing car on or around 02:34, the Defendant failed to take necessary measures at the time of the traffic accident, such as immediately stopping the said 5 taxi vehicle at repair cost and checking damage damage by immediately stopping it from the D apartment to the 2nd apartment complex of cultural week in front of the D apartment at a speed below the speed of speed; (b) due to the negligence attributable to the victim E (Nam, 46 years old) who stops after the masting driver’s vehicle; (c) left the left side of the FK5 taxi vehicle driven by the Defendant E (Seoul, 46 years old); and (d) caused the damage of KRW 729,928 of the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Although the defendant and his defense counsel had left the place with the consent of the victims, according to the legal statement of the victims, the defendant left the place without the consent of the victims, and the victim E did not leave the place to find the defendant again because he did not leave the place to the D apartment without the consent of the victims. The victim E found the defendant's vehicle at the parking lot, but the defendant did not receive the cell phone.

Accordingly, the defendant's escape without taking necessary measures in the event of a traffic accident.

According to the police statement of G, it is recognized that the defendant informed the victim G of the cell phone number before leaving the scene, but it is also a traffic accident.

arrow