(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.10.22 2015고정9

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.10.22 2015고정9

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On July 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 05:40, and led the front of the public parking lot, which is located in 15 in the original form of a wooden City, to a lot from the edge of the Penema.

Since there is a road where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, there was a duty of care to live well the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the front part of the F taxi driven by the victim E, which was driven by the victim E, due to the negligence in driving the center line, and was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the said car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the said taxi owned by the victim limited liability company to repair the said taxi and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victims, even though it damages the said taxi to the extent that it would amount to KRW 824,426.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Investigation report (the telephone call of a police officer entering the spot);

1. A report on a traffic accident (1) a report on actual condition, and a report on a traffic accident (2) a report on actual condition;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. In light of the specific circumstances at the time of the instant traffic accident, which were acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence by the victim’s photographic body of the vehicle involved in the accident, the need to take relief measures for the victim at the time of the instant traffic accident is recognized, and as long as the Defendant was aware of the victim’s injury due to the instant traffic accident, he/she can confirm his/her identity before leaving the site without taking relief measures for the victim even if he/she was aware of

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2016.10.07 2016고단2367

-서울동부지방법원 2016.03.24 2015노1209

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.05.15 2018고단4155

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.01.16 2013고단2759

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.09.03 2015고단646