The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the prosecutor’s grounds of appeal (e.g., the Defendant had already taken pictures of women over a number of times and committed the instant crime, and the Defendant’s seizure 1 and 2 of the total list of seized articles that were seized to prevent recidivism should be confiscated, it is unreasonable for the lower court to impose an order to complete sexual assault treatment programs for a fine of 1.5 million won and 40 hours.

2. In light of the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstance before and after the instant crime, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior, environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is not deemed to be unreasonable, considering all the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, since the Defendant’s punishment is not determined to be unreasonable, since it is not reasonable, considering all the circumstances asserted in the grounds for appeal.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.