The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the prosecutor’s appeal grounds (e.g., the nature of each crime committed by the Defendant, the damage inflicted on the victim, and the fact that the Defendant was fined due to the crime of injury, etc., the lower court’s sentence imposing an order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 3,00,000 won and 24 hours is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is deemed to have committed each of the crimes of this case in a contingent manner, the defendant is deemed to have committed a mistake, the victim expresses his intention that he does not want the punishment of the defendant, there is no record of criminal punishment due to a sex crime, and other various factors specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the motive and background of each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, the degree of damage, and the character and conduct, environment, and family relationship of the defendant as stated in the records and arguments of this case, considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, it is not deemed that the sentence of the court below is too

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.