logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.01.14 2015고단1060
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an employee in charge of the distribution of scrap iron in F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) who collects and supplies scrap metal to the victim Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.”), and Defendant B is a representative director of H (the location of the port: I) who is established for the purpose of the retail business of scrap iron and non-ferrous iron wholesale.

Defendant

A In the process of collecting and delivering scrap metal from a majority of scrap metal and supplying it to the victim company, A had the victim company receive additional transportation expenses by manipulating transportation documents by using false transportation expenses according to transportation distance, etc., Defendant B also received additional transportation expenses from the victim company, Taesan Steel Co., Ltd. (S. 3 Ga-dong 518-2) located in the front line (S., Youngjin-gu, Jeon-gu, Jeonju), J (K), and L (S.: Gwangju Northern-gu Ma), and forged the measurement using the measurement form. The fact was that: (a) had the victim company supplied the scrap metal purchased from the high iron company located in the relevant base, such as the port of port or the Gyeongbuk-do, and (b) had the victim company receive additional transportation expenses from the victim company and the victim company, who purchased the scrap metal purchased from the scrap iron company located in the front line even if it was impossible to know the victim’s name as if it was transported.

1. On October 2010, Defendant A, at H office Co., Ltd., Ltd., Defendant B, at the time of forging private document forgery, the event of the foregoing investigation document, and the fraud, offered the Defendant B with the model of measurement of the company Taesan Steel, J, and L in the computer file format. Defendant B, on November 9, 2010, without authority, entered the vehicle number “N”, “2,900 kilograms”, “N”, “2,90 kilograms”, and the publishing place” into “Tansan Steel.”

arrow