A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From around 1990 to 2009, the Defendant operated the "D Company" as a metal processing business chain in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

On May 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “GG companies operated by the Victim FF in G companies in G, G, G, G, and G, G, G, G, G, G, and G, G, G, G, G, G, and G, G, G, G, G, G, and G, G, G, G, and G, G, G, G, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L,

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to supply scrap metal as promised, even if the Defendant received advance payment of KRW 60 million from H, etc., even if he did not have any intent or ability to supply scrap metal as promised by the victim, on the ground that the Defendant, from around 2006, received approximately KRW 144,70,000,000,000,000,000 from the company that supplied steel materials to D companies, and the Defendant purchased steel materials necessary to supply scrap metal to the victim and thereby is not capable of operating the manufacturing industry.

The Defendant received 60 million won in total from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (I) account in the name of the Defendant in advance of payment for scrap metal, including the sum of 5 million won on May 14, 2008, 30 million won on May 15, 2008, 15 million won on May 16, 2008, 16, 10 million won on May 16, 2008, and 60 million won on May 19, 2008.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Details of entry into the steel industry of the D Steel company;

1. Receipts:

1. A sales contract for scrap metal;

1. A written confirmation of the results of electronic financial transfer;

1. Notarial deeds;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion and judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended execution claim that there is no fact of deceiving the victim like the crime, and that there is no intention of defraudation

For the first time, this law has been duly adopted and investigated.