Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 High Court Decision 149]

1. On October 20, 2012, the Defendant was running at around 17:50 on the 20th of October 2012, while driving a Brocketing car, and driving a two-lane road in front of the North-gu office located in the Yongsan-gu, Gwangju, along one-lane from the north-gu, the middle middle ginseng distance from the north-gu, North-gu, Gwangju. At that time, the Defendant stopped in order to keep and drive a safety distance to avoid collision by accurately transmitting the vehicle behind the vehicle in front, while keeping the safety distance from the brac is going ahead of the same direction.

In the signal atmosphere, the back panion of the D Allied car driven by the victim C(W, 30 years old) who was in the traffic signal atmosphere was predicted to the front panion of the vehicle driven by the defendant.

Due to the above mistake, the above victim and the above passenger car E (ma, 46 years old), F (n, F, 38 years old), G (ma, 16 years old), and H (n, 14 years old), which require treatment for each two weeks period, suffered from necessary injury for about two days, and at the same time, damaged the above AR car to cover the repair cost of KRW 336,856.

2. While the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road that was not covered by mandatory insurance with the owner of B rocketing passenger vehicle, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle without purchasing mandatory insurance for the aforementioned temporary border.

[2014 high-level 152] The Defendant, around 19:30 on the same day, was waiting for a signal signal by driving a B B BB car in front of the diesel Hospital in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, and then the victim J (38 years of age) followed to prevent the Defendant from escaping, extracted the key of the said BB car, and added the Defendant’s scam belt, but put it on the Defendant’s scam, while scaming it twice as a drinking, the Defendant scams the victim’s scam indemnity requiring one-day medical treatment, and continued to stop at the same time.