logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고단4303
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 29, 2015, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated a DNA-based car that was not covered by mandatory insurance from the wind spawn distance located in the new course of the Suwon-si Suwon-si flood on April 2015.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those engaged in driving DNA automobiles.

On April 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) operated the said car from the windline located in the new course of the Gungcheon-si Metropolitan Area (U.S.) on April 20, 2015; and (b) therefore, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely operate the steering system, steering system, brakes, and other devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, driven a day-to-day vehicle by negligence while driving a day-to-day room while being driven by the victim E (e.g., 47 years of age) who was waiting for the signal from the above shooting distance, followed the part of the driver's end-to-day vehicle by the front-end part of the maz car, and due to the shock, caused the shock to be followed by the HBW vehicle driven by G.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time, 3,329,903 won, such as the exchange of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front, were to be 3,754,896 won, such as the exchange of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front, and the Defendant escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle in front, and providing relief to the injured.

3. On April 29, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement). The Defendant received a traffic accident report, such as the above paragraph (2), from the windline located in the new waterways of the Suwon-si flood area around 20:05, and sent out.

arrow