The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The court below held that the defendant was aware of the crime of this case and did not have any other penalty in addition to the punishment of a fine once, and that there was no other penalty, and that there was no specific occupation before the crime of this case. There was no specific occupation before the crime of this case. It was an economically difficult situation, such as the fact that the defendant did not directly harm the body of the victims at the time of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant did not directly harm the victims at the time of the crime of this case, and that the above victim did not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim of special robbery during the crime of this case.

However, the crime of this case was committed by cutting down goods displayed on the convenience store, taking a knife and taking cash into the convenience store at the new wall time. The nature of the crime is very significant in light of the method of planned crime and the attitude of action. In particular, the defendant prepared to commit the crime by putting the test color clothes, knife, knife and the test color mar and directly made by himself in the hand room to commit robbery, after printing the convenience point in the alley, he completed the crime in the form of wearing the clothes in the vicinity of the public telephone room and wearing the knife and the knife with the knife and the knife in the knife in the face of the above public telephone, and again arrested 40,000 won after the escape. The victim was faced with the mental shock, and the victim's strong crime like robbery of this case's robbery is hard to be considered to be important in the sentencing guidelines of the defendant, as well as the defendant's motive and character factors following the sentencing guidelines.