The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime; (b) while making it difficult to take economic circumstances; (c) while the Defendant was driving a cargo vehicle without mandatory insurance and making a left-hand turn at a non-protection level, the instant crime is deemed to have escaped without taking relief measures, etc. even though the Defendant was shocking the victim who walked at the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian name and was in need of approximately six weeks of medical treatment; (d) the nature of the relevant crime is heavy; (e) the victim was under severe damage; (e) the victim did not reach an agreement or recover from damage; and (e) other circumstances, such as the motive for the instant crime; (e) the character and conduct of the Defendant; (e) the Defendant’s character and environment; (e) family relationship; and (e) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., and (e) the sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.