The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) although the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case; (b) the crime of this case is against the defendant; (c) in order to obtain a loan by deceiving the apartment that the defendant cannot receive any additional security loan due to the lease deposit, etc. as if there is no lessee, he/she forged an application for the price of households in the name of lessee, etc.; (d) using the details of the transfer household inspection that the defendant submitted and received, and acquired the above apartment from the victim as security; (e) the crime is of heavy nature; (e) the amount of fraud is the maximum amount; (e) the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim or recover from damage; and (e) other circumstances, such as the motive for the crime of this case, character and conduct of the defendant, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records and pleadings, the defendant'

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.