1. 2/160 shares out of 8,251 square meters of F forest land in Yongsan-gu, Manyang-si, Manyang-si, in relation to the Plaintiff A, and 1/160 shares in each of the Plaintiff B, C, 5/160.

1. Basic facts

A. G, H, I, and J completed on April 30, 1971 the registration of initial 1/4 shares of K 1/4 shares in the 16th 6th 3th 6th 3th Kayang-gun, G, H, I, and J.

Since then, the above land was changed to 8251 square meters of land Frandong-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan-si (hereinafter “instant real estate”) and 7974 square meters of L forest land (hereinafter “instant 2 real estate”); hereinafter “instant 1 and 2 real estate” due to the change of administrative district name, change of administrative district, and conversion into the area unit.

B. On January 27, 2011, M, N, andO, the heir of H, after H’s death, completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 3, 1979 with respect to each of 1/12 shares of each of the land before each of the instant real estate was divided.

C. After the death of J, the Plaintiffs completed the registration of ownership transfer due to the inheritance of each of the pertinent shares of P, Q, R, S, T, U, and the instant real estate divided on February 28, 1981. Plaintiffs C, B, Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D transferred 5/160 shares, respectively.

W, X, Y, N, and U opened a clan conference on August 15, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “F and J’s father”), which is the descendants of V (hereinafter referred to as “E”), set the name of the clan consisting of five descendants of V as “E”, and establish the articles of association regarding the clan activities, including the management of the clan property, after having appointed W as the chairperson of the defendant.

E. The Defendant, including the Plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit against the aforementioned H and J descendants seeking the registration of transfer of ownership due to the termination of title trust by the High Court Decision 2016Kahap71662 on the instant real estate. On May 10, 2017, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against N, U and the Plaintiffs for the registration of transfer of ownership due to the termination of title trust, and the judgment dismissing the Defendant’s claim against the rest of theO, P, Q, R, S, and T was rendered.

The judgment of this case is referred to as "the judgment of this case"

. The Seoul High Court held that the plaintiffs are responsible for the plaintiff.