All appeals by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Examining the images taken on the Defendant’s smartphone (1) misunderstanding the facts (the guilty part of the judgment of the court below), considering the fact that each damaged woman’s body part was taken at the lower part of each damaged woman’s body, in light of the fact that each damaged woman’s body part was taken at a somewhat far away from the ordinary uniform and close distance that does not seem to be excessive exposure, but taken at a specific angle of the female body at a certain angle, it is difficult to view that each of the instant images taken by the Defendant to have taken the body that may cause sexual humiliation or shame from the perspective of the average person, and that there was no intention to do so.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Use Screening, such as Cameras, etc.) around April 10, 2016 and around 17:59 on the same day, among the facts charged in the instant case, and erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

(2) The sentence of the court below, which sentenced the defendant to a suspended sentence of 2 years, observation of protection, order to attend school for treatment of sexual assault and confiscation of 40 hours in the six-month imprisonment, is too unreasonable.

나. 검사 (1) 사실 오인 및 법리 오해( 원심판결 중 무죄부분) 이 사건 공소사실 중 2016. 4. 10. 17:39 경 및 같은 날 17:53 경 각 성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법위반( 카메라 등 이용촬영) 의 점에 관하여, 영상 속에 피해 여성의 전신 대부분이 촬영되어 있기는 하나 피고인이 짧은 치마를 입은 여성을 몰래 촬영하기 위해 카메라를 자연스럽게 하체 부분에 두고 걷는 시늉을 하면서 촬영한 점, 피고인이 촬영한 휴대전화 기의 촬영 각도를 살펴보면 피고인은 낮은 지점에서 피해 여성의 치마 속 부분을 올려다보는 방향으로 촬영하였고 그 주변 여성 또는 사람들이 모두 긴팔, 긴 바지를 입었음에도 하얀 치마 및 하얀...