The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Criminal facts

1. On September 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50 on September 6, 2013, the Defendant damaged the use of two advertising boards for the management of the C Station, which are installed at 2-1 and 3-1 time while under the influence of alcohol, from the subway station B, Sungnam-si, Seonam-si, the subway station B, the subway station of the third underground level, thereby impairing its utility.

B. On September 6, 2013, from around 23:55 to 00:15 the following day, the Defendant interfered with business by asking the service personnel D about the reason why the service personnel damaged the advertisement board to the Defendant, etc. in the above C Station, and interfered with the Defendant’s service guidance by force by forcing the users of the subway station who found the disturbance to ask the Defendant of the disturbance, such as: (a) whether the service personnel did not have any fact that the advertisement board was damaged; (b) whether the service personnel was ordered to do so; (c) whether it was ordered to do so; and (d) whether it was flad with the flash; and (d) whether it was flad with the flash; and (e) whether it was flad with the flash; and (e) whether the equipment was cut

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the provisions of the Act and subordinate statutes to a quotation or a investigative report (CCTV image visual recording);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 366 and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence of this case is a criminal act resulting in excessive fear of the defendant's living in another place and contingently committed, such as the fact that the defendant was the first offender, the fact that the victim was found immediately after the crime, the fact that the victim was seriously killed and the victim was seriously killed and consistently up to this court, and that the damage was completely recovered and the victim did not want the punishment of the defendant.