A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 Highest 7251" is a person who runs a used vehicle sales business under the trade name of "D" in Daegu Metropolitan City, Dong-gu C.

On May 8, 2017, the Defendant was drafted an agreement on vehicle installment loan on the condition that “the debtor E, loans 50 million won, and repayment in installments for 48 months” was made by the victim E, a customer who was found to purchase a heavy vehicle within the said D office, and on the condition that “the debtor E, loans 50 million won, and repayment in installments for 48 months.”

However, even if the Defendant applied for an automobile installment loan in the name of the victim and received a direct payment of the loan, it was thought that he would use the loan to pay his personal debts, etc., and in fact, he did not intend to use the loan as the sales price of used cars.

The defendant deceiving the victim as above and had the victim borrow 50 million won from the NH Capital, and had the victim borrow 50 million won from the NH Capital, from the time on May 10, 2017, the defendant received transfer of 50 million won from the above 50 million won around 10, 2017

6. From July 1, 200 to July 200, the victims had the victims enticed, and had the victims get loans from the NA Capital Capitals more than three times in total, and received a total of KRW 126 million from the victims.

"2018 Highest 456" Defendant is a person who runs a used vehicle sales business under the trade name of "D" in Daegu Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Seoul.

A. On May 8, 2017, the Defendant, a customer, who was found to purchase a heavy-sized vehicle within the said D office, concluded that “The Defendant would take out a capital loan of an amount equivalent to KRW 84 million with respect to a vehicle 8,000,000” to the victim E, a customer, who was found to purchase a heavy-sized vehicle. However, in fact, even if the Defendant applied for a vehicle installment loan under the victim’s name and received a direct deposit of the loan, the Defendant merely thought that the loan was used for the Defendant’s personal debt repayment, etc., and actually did not have the intent or ability to use the loan as a used vehicle sales price

Nevertheless, the defendant is the victim as above.