Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:00 to 02:00 on April 12, 2019, the Defendant, while drinking and drinking in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheong-si, expressed that the victim D, who was under the influence of alcohol, caused the Defendant to be able to take a bath to the Defendant, and the victim D, who was able to take a face of the above D, and the victim E said E said h’s chest to take the Defendant’s chest on his hand.

As such, the Defendant, in his hand, flaged the head debt of the above E, flabed the right wind, flabed with a hack, flabb, flab, flab, d's head debt of the victim D by flabing the Defendant’s hand when the victim D and the victim F knife the Defendant, and assaulted D again by flabing the Defendant’s head debt of the victim D by f, f to make the Defendant genuine, f to leave the Defendant, and to send the cab by flicking the Defendant’s shoulder by hand, flabed the Defendant’s shoulder, and carried the left part of the above F.

As a result, the defendant brought about about 21 days to the victim F, the victim D, the left-hand part of the 14-day therapy, the complete part of the whole part, and the multiple part of the part, which require the victim E to give approximately 14 days medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Bodily damaged photographs;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant, who committed an injury to the victims of the instant crime; and (b) the Defendant’s violence of the instant case is bad appraisal of the victims.