All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of mistake of facts (as to the defendant C), the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant C of the fact that the defendant C had inflicted an injury on the victim M, in collaboration with the defendant A and B, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The respective sentence of the lower court against the above Defendants (Defendant A and B) (the suspended sentence of two years in one year and six months in one year and six months in one year and six months in one, Defendant B: fine of two thousand won in one million won in one year and two years in one year and six), is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. The court below duly adopted and examined the evidence as to the assertion of mistake of facts, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, i.e., at the time of the first investigation by the police, the victim: (a) at the time of the victim’s first investigation, the victim: (b) at the time of the victim’s physical body, the victim: (c) at the price of the left knebbing and the part of the knebing part; (d) the driver (the Defendant A) at the knee knebbbbing price three times; and (e) the two remaining persons other than the driver (the Defendant C) moved back to the knee knee kbbbbing part; (e) at the time of the investigation by the prosecutor, the victim tried to remove the victim’s knbing part of the body of the Defendant A; and (e) at the time of the victim’s first investigation, the victim made it difficult to view the victim’s face in the process of assault and the Defendant C’s 1’s face.