(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.08 2015고정1345

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.08 2015고정1345

과실치상

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On December 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00 on December 26, 2014, in Yongsan-gu Seoul; (b) while having been in a dispute with the victim D, who was aware of his/her reputation, brought him/her to talk with the victim; and (c) he/she brought him/her to face with the victim.

In such cases, the defendant neglected his/her duty of care to not contact the victim's face, thereby making the defendant saw the victim's saws of care.

Although the defendant has a duty of care to keep the dog in mind so that it does not harm or injure others, or to wear the protective gear such as the dog, he neglected it, so that the dog is not taken properly, and the dog is able to wear the body in the course of the process, and the dog is qui to the left side of the victim, and the dog goes beyond the victim in the process.

As a result, the defendant suffered by negligence the whole parts of the part in need of treatment for about 2 weeks from the victim.

2. Determination

A. Determination 1 on the part that the Defendant caused the victim to undergo a fluence by negligence while threateninging the victim to the victim) The victim’s partial statements in this court and statements in investigative agencies, consistent with this part of the facts charged, are difficult to believe in light of the following circumstances.

(1) The statements made by a victim are not consistent.

The police and prosecutor's office stated that the defendant unilaterally extending out of the victim's hands, and that the defendant faced the victim's face with fingers while living together with the victim, but this court examines the victim's face, and that the victim is flicking the victim in this court, and the victim's face is flicking the victim, and the victim's face is flicking into the victim'

was stated.

② Former site in this case

E/F’s statements are also inconsistent with those of E/F.

E is selling in order to avoid the defect that a person under this law desires to see and fit to the defendant while harming the victim.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2014.01.09 2013고정2154

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.05.07 2013고단430

-서울중앙지방법원 2012.09.26 2012고정3879

-서울북부지방법원 2013.12.18 2013고정2845

-서울서부지방법원 2016.12.27 2016고단3357