1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the Plaintiff, which became final and conclusive by the judgment of remand (Supreme Court Decision 2011Da15292 Decided June 9, 201), among the judgment of the first instance, was 870.

1. The damages amounting to KRW 870 million for which the plaintiff's claim was finally rejected in the judgment of remand through the first instance trial and the second instance trial before remand, and the damages amounting to the damages amounting to KRW 96,127,130,00 for which the plaintiff's claim was finally determined separately. excluding this, the damages amounting to KRW 28,189,60 for substitute afforestation expenses in the year 1996 (=5,39,600 for substitute afforestation expenses of KRW 28,39,60 for substitute afforestation expenses of KRW 1,234,440 for its exclusive use charges of KRW 7,862,40 for the damages amounting to KRW 7,862,40 for the damages amounting to KRW 3,193,390 for the guaranteed insurance premiums of KRW 850,00 for forest afforestation expenses of KRW 850,99,310 for the damages amounting to KRW 1,98,500,50 for the damages amount of insurance premium).

2. Basic facts

A. The enforcement of the instant waste disposal business and conflict ① The Plaintiff is a corporation with the purpose of collecting, transporting, intermediate, and final disposal of industrial wastes, and the Plaintiff’s operation of waste disposal business (hereinafter “instant waste disposal business”) in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, for a waste disposal business (hereinafter “instant land”), and obtained the Defendant’s approval to use the instant land on March 20, 1995.

② On June 30, 1995, the Plaintiff received an appropriate notification from the Mayor/Do governor on the final waste disposal business of 54,584 square meters of six parcels of land, including part of the instant land. On July 18, 1996, the Plaintiff obtained approval on the location of the instant land from the Mayor of Ulsan Metropolitan City for one waste disposal facility (reclaimed site). On December 30, 1996, on December 30, 1996, the Plaintiff continued to implement the project by obtaining necessary approval for the project, such as receiving a report on development activities for a construction period of 3 years for the said construction period.

③ However, from July 195 to July 1995, the “Neung-gun L and M residents in the vicinity of the land to be reclaimed for the disposal site” continues to oppose the civil petition.