1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 201, Plaintiff B filed a complaint against the Defendant on charges of fraud with the purport that “The Defendant would have the Plaintiff build a bridge jointly with Plaintiff B in the vicinity of Gyeonggi-gun F, and would have the Plaintiff B pay the total cost of building a bridge, including design cost,” and on October 17, 201, the branch office of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a non-prosecution disposition against the Defendant on the charge of having the Defendant suspected of having the Defendant.

B. As indicated in attached Table 1, a written confirmation of September 28, 201 (No. 2-1, hereinafter “instant confirmation”) between the Plaintiff B and the Defendant was prepared.

C. On September 29, 2011, Plaintiff B and the Defendant drafted a letter of commitment performance (Evidence B, hereinafter “instant letter of commitment”). On the same day, the letter of commitment performance in this case was written at the notary public G office’s office in 02703 in 2011.

On September 30, 2011, I guaranteed in accordance with the letter of commitment to the instant agreement that the Plaintiff’s land H is liable for the cancellation of collateral mortgage and superficies until November 31, 201, if the land was not performed by November 31, 201.

E. On January 7, 2014, Plaintiff B obtained authorization of completion from the head of Bupyeong-gu Gun, after obtaining a permit for installation of L where the river runs across the Gyeonggi-gun J and two lots of land.

F. The Defendant filed a complaint against Plaintiff B on the instant written confirmation of the instant case with the charge of forging private documents, uttering of a falsified investigation document, and attempted fraud. However, on May 25, 2016, the District Prosecutors’ Office in the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a non-prosecution disposition against Plaintiff B on the charge of having been suspected of having committed a non-prosecution disposition (defluence of evidence) (defluence of evidence) against Plaintiff B, and prosecuted the Defendant as the Suwon District Court Branch Branch 2016Kadan1505

G. On April 27, 2017, the Defendant rendered an Ansan District Court No. 2016Kadan1505 Decided April 27, 2017.