logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.05.13 2020고정246
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are friendly.

B around 09:20 on September 30, 2019, the Defendants jointly left tobacco at the convenience store near the main point of “D” located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul, and Defendant A left the convenience store, and Defendant E (31 years of age) who returned to the house after drinking alcohol at the above main point with the victim E (hereinafter referred to as “W”) who was frighting with the shoulder, and were in dispute, and fright E with her shoulder by hand on the ground that E was pushed up with her body by hand, and she was pushed up with her body by hand, and she was tight up to the roadside floor of the E, she was frighted to her head, and she was frighted to her head, and she was frighted to her head, and she was frighted to her head, and she was frighted to her body, and she was frighted to her head, and she was frighted to her body by Defendant E.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim E such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury on the victim F, such as salt, tensions, etc., which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Investigation reports (Submission of photographs of suspect E), investigation reports (Submission of clothes of suspect F), investigation reports (Submission of video images of the shots), investigation reports (fields and CCTV confirmations), and investigation reports (fields and CCTVs);

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. The Defendants alleged that they did not perform some of the acts indicated in the facts charged, but according to each of the above evidence, the Defendants asserted that they did not perform the act.

arrow