1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff, the cause of the claim, around 16:00 on August 22, 2008, stated that “A facility business operator who had the Defendant present at the court room in Seoul Western District Court 2008DaMa860 on or before the Seoul Western District Court 303 (Seoul Western District Court 2008DaMa860) as a witness of the instant case, is not the end of September 2007 but the end of October 15, 200.” There is no lack of evidence to say that “A facility business operator who had the Defendant present at the court as a witness of the instant case, stating that “(the date on which the Defendant performed multiple construction works on or before Seoul Western-gu 2nd floor D 202) on or after October 16 through 18, 2008.” There is no fact that the Plaintiff

On August 20, 2009 and October 29, 2009, the Plaintiff appeared as a witness in the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2009No250 decided Oct. 29, 2009, and testified to the effect that “C does not seem to have any ever changed the date of the construction work to the Defendant on August 22, 2008, and the Plaintiff does not actively or actively state it to the Defendant.”

On November 10, 2010, the Plaintiff was indicted on the charge of perjury, and was sentenced to a two-year verdict of suspended sentence in the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2010Ma1306 Decided November 10, 201, and appealed against the above judgment.

On January 18, 2011, the Defendant appeared as a witness in Seoul Western District Court 2010No1312, the appellate court of the above judgment, which was the appellate court of the judgment, and instigated C to give a perjury on August 22, 2008, and testified to the Defendant that “the Plaintiff was not an important part,” and that the Plaintiff actively participated in it on the next side.

Ultimately, the plaintiff was sentenced to the dismissal of an appeal due to the defendant's aforementioned false testimony, and the appeal was filed against the above judgment, but the appeal was also dismissed, and thus the above conviction against the plaintiff became final and conclusive.

Thus, the defendant's false testimony is punished for perjury and suffered mental suffering. Therefore, the defendant is guilty.