beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s sales contract brokerage 1) The Plaintiff requested the brokerage of real estate to be purchased from D and the Defendant C used the real estate in physical color, and the Plaintiff’s land in Seo-gu, Seoan-si E (hereinafter “instant land”).
(2) On April 13, 1991, the Plaintiff arranged the purchase and sale contract of the instant land as a buyer D, and the Defendant C as a seller F’s broker.
3) However, the actual purchaser of the instant land was the Defendant B, and the Defendant B entered into the instant sales contract by lending the Plaintiff’s name. (b) After the Plaintiff’s perjury judgment 1, the Defendant B filed a complaint against the crime of embezzlement. The Plaintiff appeared as a witness in the Daejeon High Court 201No33, and testified in the criminal trial against D continuing to be the Daejeon High Court 201No33.
2) The Plaintiff was indicted for perjury due to the aforementioned testimony, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on December 13, 201, with the Daejeon District Court 201Da4179, which was sentenced to imprisonment for six months, and appealed with the Daejeon District Court 201No2900, and was sentenced not guilty on January 16, 2013. C. The Defendants’ tort liability 1) appeared in the first instance court of the Plaintiff’s perjury and testified as a witness and submitted false evidentiary materials to the Plaintiff so that they were convicted. The Defendants should compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred to the Plaintiff.
2) The amount of damages to be compensated for is as follows: ① 6 million won for attorney fees, ② 4 million won for attendance at the trial date and for consultation with the attorney’s office, ③ KRW 16 million for lost earnings during the trial period, ④ KRW 30 million for consolation money, ④ KRW 56,00,000 for consolation money. According to the evidence Nos. 6 through 8 (including serial numbers) of the judgment of February 2, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendants on the perjury, but the prosecutor of the Incheon District Prosecutors’ Office in the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office filed a non-prosecution disposition against the Defendants on April 30, 2014 (including serial numbers).