logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.30 2013가단38426
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 14,487,595 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from February 1, 2012 to April 30, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 17, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works with the Defendant with the content that the repair works of the building located in the Si/Gunpo-si B (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by the Defendant will be determined as the construction period from November 21, 201 to December 4, 201, from November 21, 2011, as the supply price of KRW 48,000,000 (including value-added tax, KRW 52,80,000), and that the Plaintiff would receive a contract.

(hereinafter “instant construction contract”). B.

While the Plaintiff was performing construction works under the instant construction contract, around December 2012, the Plaintiff performed additional construction works on the part that was not included in the original construction contract. The details of the additional construction works and the construction cost for the corresponding portion are as follows.

(1) Of the details of the instant construction work, the construction cost shall be calculated by applying the unit price calculated at the time of the contract to the instant construction work. The details of the additional construction work shall be calculated by applying the unit price calculated at the time of the contract to the instant construction work. Parts 1,430,475 2 of the additional construction cost to replace the 1,430,899 3,012 4 outside air conditioners 610,349 5, 437,305 7, 175 of the additional construction cost to the 1,437,307, 507, 171, 1240, 170, 703, 191, 191, 192, and 157, 3710, 157, 167, 157, 167, 157, 167, 176, 275, and 157,27,4,27.

C. By December 4, 2011, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 45 million (including value-added tax) out of the construction cost under the instant construction contract.

On January 2012, the Plaintiff completed all the construction work including the instant supplementary construction work.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-3, Gap evidence 3-1, and witness C.

arrow