1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above part shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 3, 2009, the Plaintiff currently owned the apartment Nos. 105 and 2404 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from the Defendant Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On November 4, 2013, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Review and Dispute Mediation Committee filed an application for a defect review and dispute mediation with respect to the instant apartment on the ground that the instant apartment was defective in the construction of the lower wall of a public bath room, the construction of the de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto

C. On February 11, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the said commission for a defect examination and dispute mediation by asserting that there was a defect in the dice studio stud and the walls of the instant apartment, and on February 21, 2014, the Plaintiff applied for a defect examination and dispute mediation. On February 21, 2014, as a result of the on-site inspection, the said dice studio studio was found to have been slided and fungi in the string of the walls inside the dice studio, and as a result, the surface temperature of the Mali-ri portion was measured at a level lower than 3-3.2°C of the surface temperature of the healthy part. As a result of the verification of the construction of a py in the form of the land, it was found that the PE film was found to have been found to have been tightly constructed on the part of the pyrmod dancing, and that it was judged by the said commission on April 2014.

On October 17, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for a defect examination and dispute mediation with the committee on the following grounds: (a) on October 17, 2014, on the entire ceiling of the main balcony structure of the apartment of this case, the Plaintiff filed an application with the committee for a defect examination and dispute mediation by asserting that the thickness of seals is defective on the entire wall of the main balcony structure of the apartment of this case, including the water of slves and external walls; (b) the water of pipes connected to pipes connected to the whole part of the wall of the ESP structure; and (c) the water of the wall of the ESP structure; and (d) the removal of the wall in the whole; and (e) the water of the wall of the wall of the main balcony structure of the apartment of this case as a defect.