A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while operating the manufacturing company, was in default on November 2007, and became bad in credit because he was unable to repay the debt of approximately KRW 700 million, including financial rights, and thereafter, was registered as a clothing store business operator under the name of another person and started to operate approximately KRW 7 billion in the door-setting.

On September 2010, the Defendant: (a) received approximately KRW 130,000,000 from the victim C, known to the general public, to engage in a partnership business; and (b) began to operate an agency that sells the ice clothes, etc. under the name of the victim C in the name of the Governor C, Jeollabuk-do; and (c) the Defendant received 7% or 10% of the total sales from the damaged party as profit dividends in return for the agency operation.

During that period, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant raise the operating price to 15% of the sales amount, and the victim was unable to accept it, the Defendant unilaterally terminated the above business agreement on February 2, 2013, and was in de facto marital relationship from March 2013.

E The agency's operation began solely after concluding an agency contract with the NNA under the name of F on the ground of the agent's occupation of F as the agent's occupation.

In addition, on June 12, 2013, G was proposed to establish a new four-party agency by introducing a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a branch of a group of five million won.

However, the Defendant was unable to establish an agency to G until the period promised because it did not have any authority in connection with the establishment of a four-wave agency, and thereby, G could be able to establish an agency at the four-wave headquarters “A, the main owner of the four-wave agency.”

The NASABE ACT ACT ACT ACT ACT ACT. The NAPY ACT ACT ACT ACT..