beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 3, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) entered the Army on December 3, 2012; (b) consistently complained of the left-hand knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne knee in the military training; (c) was diagnosed by the Armed Forces Hospital on March 6, 2013; and (d) on March 19, 2013, the Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital on May 27, 2013 under the diagnosis of the “overside kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne on the left-hand side of the
B. On December 1, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that the left knee, among the Hane-gun, was killed in the corridor of the Armed Forces Gangseo-gu Hospital and incurred the instant wounds, and filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State with the Defendant on July 1, 2013.
In regard to this, the Defendant rendered a decision on December 17, 2013 on the fact that the Plaintiff had confirmed the past ability to receive 44 times medical treatment under the diagnosis of half-month depression on the part of the Plaintiff’s entrance, and thus, the proximate causal relation between the outbreak or aggravation of the instant wounds and the military service cannot be acknowledged.
(hereinafter referred to as "only a non-applicable decision for persons eligible for veteran's compensation" is a disposition of this case). [The grounds for recognition] does not dispute the issue; entries in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, 9, 13, 14, 17; Eul's evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was erroneous in the disposition of this case on a different premise, even though the Plaintiff was kneee in middle school, but completely cured, and the instant injury was caused by the instant military training conducted twice during the period of new illness education and training.
B. (1) The plaintiff was diagnosed as "Sekne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-k