1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts added or modified under paragraph (2) below, and thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The portion added or modified to the judgment of the court of first instance, No. 5, No. 12, which read “........, all appeals filed by the intervenors, E, F, and Non-Party Trade Union were dismissed.”

On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, “68” shall be added to “24” next to “24”.

Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to "I see" in Part 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance shall be changed to "investment ratio".

The contents of Section 13 of the first instance judgment are modified as follows: “A evidence No. 67 provides that C, the chief site director of the L branch, at the time of collective bargaining between the Plaintiff and the L branch held on June 7, 2012, appears to have made a statement on the J issues. However, in light of the overall purport of the above statement and the attitude of L branch before and after the commencement of the industrial action, it is difficult to deem that the main purpose of the industrial action of the L branch was in J acceptance by the above statement.

In the first instance judgment No. 14, the "J Sale Stack" in the second sentence shall be added to the following:

Part 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to "duct 6".

In the first instance judgment, "69" shall be added to "48" following the 15th page "10."

On the 15th page of the first instance judgment, the "Witness" in the 12th sentence shall be changed to "the first instance court witness", and "D" shall be added to "the second instance court witness S" following the same conduct.

In the first instance judgment, it is difficult to see the first instance judgment No. 16.2, and the contents of Gap evidence No. 73 among evidence No. 70 to 82 submitted by the plaintiff at the trial court are about Gap's acceptance of J.