Defendant

A and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

C above.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A shall report the marriage on December 28, 2001 with H and the spouse who was divorced on May 16, 201, and on May 16, 201, Defendant B shall be the pro-friendly type of Defendant A, and Defendant C shall be on February 24, 201, and on February 24, 201, Defendant C shall be on a lease of KRW 206 503,00,000,000,000,000,000.

On March 30, 201, the Defendants paid the property division amount of KRW 260 million and the consolation money of KRW 30 million due to divorce to the above H from the Seoul High Court 1 Family Division on March 30, 201, and for the same year.

9. On May 31, 201, when the auction procedure was commenced on May 31, 201, Defendant C actually used the above apartment, but Defendant B did not have been residing in the room 1 column of the above apartment, and agreed to receive the dividend after reporting the right as if it had been resided in the room 1 column of the above apartment.

On June 29, 201, the Defendants submitted the related documents to the effect that, in the above case of compulsory auction by the court of JJ on the above apartment, Defendant C is KRW 100 million in the column of the deposit deposit in the form of the report on rights and the request for distribution kept in that place, and Defendant B submitted the related documents to the effect that, among the above apartment, Defendant B uses the whole [part excluding the part ] among the above apartment (part excluding the part ], and Defendant B submitted the related documents to the effect that, on the 30th of the same month, the above report on rights and the request for distribution was written in the column of the deposit in the form of the report on rights and the request for distribution, and affixed seals to the person who received the demand for distribution, and affixed seals to the above apartment, Defendant B submitted the related documents to the effect that one column of the above apartment is used along with the lease contract.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to do so and without knowing such fact.