logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.08.29 2013고단3862
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months.

Defendants are jointly and severally liable.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants, “2013 Man-Ma3862,” posted an article stating that goods are sold on the Internet bulletin board, and planned to receive money from the victims and use the money for their livelihood if contact with the victims were to be taken place.

On December 7, 2012, at around 16:18, the Defendants posted a letter “sale of a game item” on the “heat blood online” game box bulletin board in the Maamamban-dong, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and falsely read that “The victim Q Q, who had contacted with the said letter, sells at KRW 200,00,000, the one of the blood womb clothes, two of the blood transfusions, and one of the blood transfusions.”

However, even if the defendants received the above money from the victim, they did not have the intent or ability to sell the items.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above and were transferred KRW 200,000 from Defendant B to Defendant Gwangju Bank account under the name of sales proceeds.

The Defendants conspired, from around that time to April 18, 2013, received a total of KRW 7.3 million in total from 25 times as indicated in the separate crime list (1) by the said method, in the name of the Defendants.

2. “2013 Highest 3928”: Defendant B, along with Defendant A, posted a false statement on the sales of goods, etc. on an Internet bulletin board, and reported the false statement to the victims who come to contact with them, and conspired them to use them for daily expenses by receiving money.

On February 20, 2013, the Defendant posted an advertisement “DGX-230 pop-up shop” on the Internet site NAP bulletin board, and said, “The Defendant sent 3.50,000 won to the victim R who has contacted with the Defendant.”

However, even if the defendant and A receive money from the victim, they thought to use it as a living cost, and they did not have the intention or ability to deliver the goods to the victim.

In this respect.

arrow