logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.18 2016가합25878
부동산인도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall list the annexed sheet

1.The listed real estate,

B. Attached List of Defendant C

2. The description;

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff in progress of a housing redevelopment improvement project is a housing redevelopment improvement project association whose registration of incorporation was completed on March 24, 2009 on March 24, 2009, in order to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant improvement project”) with the size of 87,783 square meters in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a project implementation district under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

The plaintiff is the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the project implementation authorization (hereinafter referred to as the "project implementation authorization") on January 10, 2013 from the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B, on November 25, 2015, the project implementation authorization was obtained on September 12, 2016, and the management and disposal plan was issued on September 12, 2016 pursuant to Article 48(1) of the Act, and the management and disposal plan was publicly notified on September 19, 2016 as the F Public Notice of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Attached Form

List

1.2.3 The real estate recorded on February 3, 200 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant real estate”) is located within the implementation zone of the instant rearrangement project.

Defendant B’s Schedule

1. A list in the annexed sheet in the real estate recorded (hereinafter referred to as “real estate No. 1 of this case”) GJB, and the defendant C

2. A separate suit against the real estate recorded (hereinafter referred to as “second real estate of this case”) and the defendant D shall list the separate suit

3. The real estate of this case currently occupies each of the instant real estate while running a store in the registered real estate (hereinafter “third real estate of this case”).

The Plaintiff filed an application with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal for a ruling of expropriation, which did not consult with the Defendants on the compensation for losses, and on January 20, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application with the said Committee for a ruling of expropriation. On March 10, 2017, the date of commencement of expropriation by the said Committee, KRW 156,745,00, KRW 21,433,30, KRW 21,433, and KRW 19,533,30, KRW 30, and KRW 19,530, KRW 30.

arrow